Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re Appeal of Stratton Corporation

Supreme Court of Vermont
600 A.2d 297 (1991)


Facts

The Stratton Corporation (Stratton) (plaintiff) owned property along Kidder Brook, an upland stream. Stratton had long-term plans for development of the area and held six land use permits. William and Elizabeth Uptegrove (defendants) filed a petition with the Vermont Water Resources Board (Board) to have Kidder Brook reclassified from a Class B to Class A surface water. This reclassification affected the quality standards under which the water was managed. The Board initiated rulemaking proceedings regarding the reclassification, as required by the Vermont Water Pollution Control Act. During the notice and comment period, Stratton filed its objection to reclassification based on the impact it might have on Stratton’s property rights and its redevelopment plans. The Board considered ten statutory factors to determine whether the reclassification was in the public interest. The Board voted to reclassify Kidder Brook. Stratton appealed the reclassification before the Windham Superior Court, arguing that the Board was required to conduct a trial-type hearing rather than an informal rulemaking procedure. The superior court dismissed the petition. Stratton appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Dooley, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.