In re Appeal of Stratton Corporation
Vermont Supreme Court
600 A.2d 297 (1991)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
The Stratton Corporation (Stratton) (plaintiff) owned property along Kidder Brook, an upland stream. Stratton had long-term plans for development of the area and held six land use permits. William and Elizabeth Uptegrove (defendants) filed a petition with the Vermont Water Resources Board (Board) to have Kidder Brook reclassified from a Class B to Class A surface water. This reclassification affected the quality standards under which the water was managed. The Board initiated rulemaking proceedings regarding the reclassification, as required by the Vermont Water Pollution Control Act. During the notice and comment period, Stratton filed its objection to reclassification based on the impact it might have on Stratton’s property rights and its redevelopment plans. The Board considered ten statutory factors to determine whether the reclassification was in the public interest. The Board voted to reclassify Kidder Brook. Stratton appealed the reclassification before the Windham Superior Court, arguing that the Board was required to conduct a trial-type hearing rather than an informal rulemaking procedure. The superior court dismissed the petition. Stratton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dooley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.