In re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
855 F. Supp. 2d 1030 (2012)
- Written by Sheri Dennis, JD
Facts
Apple Inc. (Apple) (defendant) was the seller of software applications (apps) and game currencies, which were virtual objects used in connection with apps. Apple advertised that certain of its apps could be downloaded for free. Garen Meguerian and other parents of minor children (plaintiffs) downloaded or permitted their children to download Apple’s free apps. Although downloading the apps was free, Apple later charged the plaintiffs without their knowledge for game currencies purchased by their children. The plaintiffs filed a complaint against Apple for violations of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). According to the plaintiffs, Apple had marketed certain apps as free to intentionally induce children into purchasing game currencies without their parents’ knowledge or consent. Apple moved to dismiss the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Davila, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.