In re Application of Converse
Nebraska Supreme Court
602 N.W.2d 500 (1999)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Paul Converse (plaintiff) was a 48-year-old law school graduate. During law school, he displayed a pattern of confrontational behavior against law school administrators, faculty, and other students based on perceived slights, his grades, and school policies. In these confrontations he publicized his grievances throughout the school community, to the media, and to the broader legal community, including courts and the state bar association. His behavior attacked his perceived adversaries personally and sought to intimidate and humiliate them, and at times included sexually inappropriate overtones. The Nebraska State Bar Commission (defendant) denied Converse’s request to take the Nebraska bar examination on the grounds of deficient moral character after a commission hearing uncovered this pattern of confrontational behavior. Converse appealed the commission’s decision, alleging that the commission’s decision should be reversed because it was based on conduct that was protected under the First Amendment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.