In re Areguillin
Board of Immigration Appeals
17 I. & N. Dec. 308 (1980)
- Written by Eric DiVito, JD
Facts
Areguillin (plaintiff) was a native and citizen of Mexico who entered the United States in a car with five other individuals. When Areguillin came across the border, she did not have any travel or entry documents. Areguillin testified that an immigration officer at the port of entry looked inside the car and questioned the driver. According to Areguillin, the immigration officer did not question her, nor did Areguillin volunteer any information. Areguillin testified that the immigration officer then permitted the car and all its occupants to enter the United States. Areguillin requested adjustment of her status as the beneficiary of an approved, immediate-relative visa petition filed by her spouse, who was a United States citizen. An immigration judge (IJ) found that Areguillin was not inspected and admitted at the time of her entry into the United States and thus was ineligible for adjustment of her status as a matter of law. Areguillin appealed the IJ’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Milhollan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.