In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
801 F. Supp. 2d 337 (2011)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
David and Frances Graver (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court against several companies (the defendant companies) (defendants) after David was exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma. The Gravers were Pennsylvania citizens, and all the defendant companies except Crown Cork & Seal (Crown) were not Pennsylvania citizens. After the state court granted summary judgment for Crown and dismissed the Gravers’ claims against it, the defendant companies removed the Gravers’ case to federal court. The defendant companies reasoned that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction over the case because there was complete diversity of citizenship between the parties after the dismissal of Crown as a defendant. The Gravers moved to remand the case to state court, arguing that under the voluntary-involuntary rule, only a voluntary dismissal of a nondiverse defendant can make a case removable. Because the Gravers had opposed Crown’s motion for summary judgment, Crown’s dismissal from the case was involuntary.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robreno, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.