In re Atlantic Pipe Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
304 F.3d 135 (2002)
In 1996, Thames-Dick Superaqueduct Partners (Thames-Dick) (defendant) obtained a contract from the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) (plaintiff) to erect and maintain an aqueduct project in Puerto Rico. Thames-Dick enlisted several subcontractors to assist in completing the project, including the Atlantic Pipe Corp. (APC) (third-party plaintiff). After installing the aqueduct, a pipe burst causing significant damage. Thames-Dick sued some of its subcontractors in order to recover costs. PRASA’s insurer then filed a suit in Puerto Rican state court seeking a declaratory judgment to ascertain if Thames-Dick’s claims were within the ambit of its insurance policy. The state court case grew and eventually spilled over into federal court, where a suit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. In the federal case, several parties to the construction contract sued Thames-Dick to recover costs associated with the accident. The federal case grew significantly with several cross-claims, counter-claims, and third-party complaints amongst various parties. During the course of the federal litigation, Thames-Dick petitioned the court to require non-binding mediation amongst the parties to be presided over by Professor Eric Green. The district court agreed and filed an order requiring every party to submit to the mediation. APC objected to the order on the grounds that the district court did not have the authority to order non-consenting parties to participate in mediation. The district court denied APC’s motion. APC appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.