In re BankAmerica Corp. Securities Litigation
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
350 F.3d 747 (2003)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
NationsBank merged with BankAmerica to form Bank of America. NationsBank investors and BankAmerica investors (plaintiffs) filed securities-fraud class actions against Bank of America (defendant) to recoup losses allegedly resulting from misrepresentations about the merger. The class actions were consolidated. A seven-member group was appointed to serve as lead plaintiffs for the class of NationsBank investors. A six-member group was appointed to serve as lead plaintiffs for the class of BankAmerica investors. A global settlement was reached at a mediation and submitted to the district court for approval. The district court presided over the complex class actions and was fully familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of the claims. Three members of the lead plaintiff group for the class of NationsBank investors (objecting members) opposed the proposed settlement, arguing that the proposed settlement was too low and that the lawyers involved in the mediation were not authorized to settle. Following a hearing, the district court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable and noted that the objecting members had unrealistic expectations about the settlement value of the class actions. The objecting members appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Melloy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.