In re Barcenas-Barrera
Board of Immigration Appeals
25 I. & N. Dec. 40 (2009)
- Written by Eric DiVito, JD
Facts
Olga Barcenas-Barrera (plaintiff) was a native and citizen of Mexico. Barcenas-Barrera gave her employer a fake Social Security card and birth certificate. The employer rejected these fake documents. Barcenas-Barrera applied for a passport, which she intended to provide to her employer as proof of her authorization to work. On the passport application, which she signed, Barcenas-Barrera falsely stated that she was born in Texas. The following year, Barcenas-Barrera’s status was adjusted to that of a lawful permanent resident after her marriage to a United States citizen. Subsequently, Barcenas-Barrera pleaded guilty to willfully and knowingly making a false statement on an application for a passport in violation of federal law. After her conviction, Barcenas-Barrera had a hearing to determine whether she was inadmissible at the time of her status adjustment. An immigration judge (IJ) found that Barcenas-Barrera was not inadmissible at the time of her adjustment of status and thus not removable. The IJ’s decision was based on the determination that Barcenas-Barrera had not falsely represented herself as a United States citizen on her passport application. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appealed the IJ’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Malphrus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.