Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re Bernhard Steiner Pianos USA, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
292 B.R. 109 (2002)


Facts

Bernhard Steiner Pianos USA, Inc. (Bernard) (debtor) sold new and consigned pianos. Ivan Kahn was the company’s founder and principal. Bernard filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code and remained open during the proceedings. The creditors were divided into classes. One group contained piano consignors and another group contained floor-plan lenders. Both groups held general unsecured claims against Bernard. Bernard submitted a reorganization plan that placed the piano consignors and the floor-plan lenders into different classes. Under the plan, the piano-consignor class was to be paid before the floor-plan lenders. The floor-plan lenders objected to the plan. The lenders argued that the lenders and the consignors should be placed in the same class because both groups were general unsecured creditors. Bernard claimed that a good business reason existed for prioritizing the unpaid consignor claims over the lenders’ claims. Kahn testified that a thriving consignment business was critical to the success of the reorganization, that consignments had suffered and would continue to suffer because prior consignors had not been paid, and that priority payment was necessary to improve Bernard’s reputation.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hale, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.