In re Bilski
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
545 F.3d 943 (2008)
Bilski and a colleague (collectively “Bilski”) (plaintiff) submitted a patent application containing 11 claims that recited a method of hedging risk in the field of commodities trading. The patent examiner rejected Bilski’s application under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the claims only solved a purely mathematical problem and thus was solely an abstract idea not directed to the technological arts. Bilski appealed to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”), which held that the examiner erred in applying the “technological arts” test, but nonetheless affirmed the examiner’s rejection of Bilski’s application. The Board held that to be patent-eligible, an invention must transform subject matter from one state to another. However, Bilski’s claims did not involve the “transformation” of anything and thus did not produce a “useful, concrete, and tangible result.” Bilski appealed the Board’s rejection of the application.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Michel, J.)
Dissent (Newman, J.)
Dissent (Mayer, J.)
Dissent (Rader, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.