In re Boston Herald

321 F.3d 174 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Boston Herald

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
321 F.3d 174 (2003)

Facts

John Connolly Jr. (defendant) was a former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent who had been criminally charged for misconduct relating to his relationships with famous organized-crime informants. During the criminal proceedings, Connolly made a request under the 1964 Criminal Justice Act (CJA) for public funds to help him pay for a defense attorney. This request contained information from Connolly showing his financial need and eligibility, including the debt Connolly already owed to his prior attorney, his assets and other debts, and his family’s assets and debts. The court granted Connolly’s CJA request to help pay for his continued defense and publicly appointed an attorney for Connolly. At Connolly’s request, the court also placed Connolly’s financial information under seal. After Connolly was convicted, the Boston Herald, Inc. (plaintiff), a newspaper, moved to have Connolly’s financial information unsealed. A magistrate and a district court judge each denied the request to unseal the information. The Boston Herald asked the First Circuit to unseal the information, claiming that the public had a First Amendment right of access to a criminal defendant’s CJA eligibility filings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

Dissent (Lipez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership