In re Braun

352 N.C. 327, 531 S.E.2d 213 (2000)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Braun

North Carolina Supreme Court
352 N.C. 327, 531 S.E.2d 213 (2000)

Play video

Facts

Nancy Braun (plaintiff), an attorney admitted in both New York and the District of Columbia, applied on December 5, 1996 for admission to the North Carolina Bar by comity. The North Carolina Board of Law Examiners (defendant) denied Braun’s application, finding that Braun failed to prove that she had been actively and substantially engaged in the practice of law for at least four out of the six years preceding her application, as required by Section .0502(3) of the Rules Governing Admission to Practice Law in the State of North Carolina. Between November 1991 and November 1996, Braun owned and operated Harvest Moon Café and Catering. Braun maintained that, in addition to operating the restaurant, she performed law-related activities for the cafe, including obtaining a business loan, resolving landlord disputes, and negotiating contracts, and provided other legal services for employees and vendors, such as traffic-court appearances. During this time, however, Braun did not operate a legal office separate from the restaurant, nor did she maintain billing records, advertise for services, or attend continuing legal education. The Board concluded that Braun displayed a lack of candor and provided misleading responses to questions in attempting to prove that her work at the restaurant constituted the active and substantial practice of law. The Superior Court of Wake County affirmed the Board’s decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Freeman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership