In re Butz

444 B.R. 301 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Butz

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
444 B.R. 301 (2011)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Freda Butz (debtor) filed for bankruptcy. Five weeks later, and four weeks after People First Federal Credit Union (People First) (creditor) had received notice of Butz’s filing, Butz received a computer-generated statement from People First. The statement included language stating that Butz’s account was past due and requesting immediate payment of the amount due. The statement also noted the dollar amount due, and there was a blank line to be filled in by the debtor, indicating the amount the debtor would be submitting as payment. The section with the noted dollar amount due and blank line was perforated to enable separation of this portion from the rest of the statement. People First’s computer system was programmed to only send the statement when Butz’s account became past due. Butz filed a complaint with the bankruptcy court alleging that People First had committed a willful violation of the automatic stay under § 362(k) of the United States Bankruptcy Code and seeking actual damages. Butz then filed a motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Opel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership