In re C.K.G.
Supreme Court of Tennessee
173 S.W.3d 714 (Tenn. 2005)
Charles G. (defendant) and Cindy C. (plaintiff) were not married, but were in a long-term relationship and decided to have children via in vitro fertilization. Cindy signed an agreement, formalizing her intent to be the mother of any child born as a result of the procedure. Two eggs from an anonymous egg donor were inserted in Cindy’s uterus and fertilized with Charles’s sperm. One of the eggs split, and Cindy gave birth to triplets, C.K.G., C.A.G., and C.L.G. (children). Cindy and Charles’s relationship deteriorated, and Cindy filed a petition with the juvenile court to establish her status as the children’s mother and obtain custody and child support. Charles objected to the petition, arguing that because Cindy had no genetic connection the children, she could not be the children’s legal mother. The juvenile court (1) ruled that Cindy had standing to be the children’s mother, (2) awarded the parties joint custody, and (3) ordered Charles to continue paying child support that had been awarded in a pendente lite order. The court of appeals affirmed. Charles appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Drowota, C.J.)
Dissent (Birch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.