In re C.T.
Cherokee Court of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
8 Am. Tribal Law 386 (2010)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
C.T. (defendant) was a Cherokee juvenile who allegedly committed property offenses on the reservation on September 27, 2009. On November 12, 2009, a juvenile-services intake counselor within the Cherokee Court of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (tribal court) took delinquency complaint JV10-07 regarding C.T.’s alleged property offenses. Fifty-five days later, on January 6, 2010, the tribe (plaintiff) filed delinquency petition JV10-07 in tribal court, charging C.T. with committing property offenses on September 27, 2009. On April 16, 2010, the tribe filed delinquency petition JV10-20, which charged C.T. with more offenses relating to the September 27, 2009, allegations. C.T. filed a motion to dismiss delinquency petition JV10-07 because of filing defects. Attempting to circumvent the dismissal of the charges contained in delinquency petition JV10-07, the tribe filed a second delinquency petition, JV10-20, which reiterated the charges contained in delinquency petition JV10-07. C.T. filed a motion to dismiss delinquency petition JV10-20 on many grounds, including violation of Cherokee Code (C.C.) § 7A-8, which set the statute of limitations for filing delinquency petitions in the tribal court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.