In re Cain

513 B.R. 316 (2014)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Cain

United States Bankruptcy Court Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit
513 B.R. 316 (2014)

SC

Facts

Andrea Cain (debtor) filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy and obtained a discharge on February 1, 2008. On July 3, 2008, Cain filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy. The chapter 13 plan included a provision to avoid an unsecured second mortgage on Cain’s home held by Amerifirst Home Improvement Financial Company (creditor). The home had a fair market value of $100,800. The senior mortgage on the home was in the amount of $106,306.38. Under federal law, Cain was not eligible for a chapter 13 discharge because she obtained a chapter 7 discharge less than four years prior. When Cain made all payments under the chapter 13 plan, she filed a motion to avoid the unsecured Amerifirst mortgage. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio denied the motion because of the chapter 7 discharge within the previous four years. Cain appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harrison, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership