In re Can-ah-couqua

29 Fed. 687 (1887)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Can-ah-couqua

United States District Court for the District of Alaska
29 Fed. 687 (1887)

Facts

In May 1883, an Indian mother, Can-ah-couqua (plaintiff), voluntarily surrendered custody of her five-year-old son, Can-ca-dach, to a Presbyterian mission school in Alaska. Can-ah-couqua gave the school custody of her child for a period of five years so that he might receive an education. Can-ah-couqua went along with the agreement for three years. During this time, the school provided Can-ca-dach with food, clothing, and shelter. Can-ah-couqua did not have to pay for anything. Can-ah-couqua recognized her son’s progress and expressed satisfaction with her son’s treatment. However, after three years, when Can-ca-dach was eight years old, Can-ah-couqua wanted her son returned to her custody. The superintendent of the mission school, William A. Kelly (defendant), refused to return Can-ca-dach to his mother’s custody. Can-ah-couqua petitioned for habeas corpus, alleging that her son was unlawfully restrained against her wishes by Superintendent Kelly and Chaplain A. E. Austin (defendant). Kelly and Austin acknowledged they had custody of Can-ca-dach pursuant to the terms of their agreement with Can-ah-couqua to keep the child for five years, and they denied that Can-ca-dach’s detention was unlawful.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership