In re Cardinal Industries, Inc.

109 B.R. 755 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Cardinal Industries, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio
109 B.R. 755 (1990)

Facts

Cardinal Industries, Inc. (CII) (debtor) manufactured modular housing units that CII and its subsidiaries (collectively, Cardinal) used in residential and commercial real estate developments. Cardinal financed the development projects with loans secured by first mortgages on the properties. Cardinal set up limited partnerships to develop the projects and made loans to some of the partnerships secured by second mortgages on the properties. Cardinal planned to syndicate the partnerships by selling limited-partnership interests to investors to raise money that Cardinal could use to pay off the second mortgages. However, the syndication was largely unsuccessful, and Cardinal found itself in financial trouble. Further adding to Cardinal’s troubles, Cardinal’s real estate developments were not generating enough rent to cover Cardinal’s first-mortgage obligations, and Cardinal had imprudently loaned $11 million to some of the partnerships to appease investors. The unsyndicated partnerships eventually defaulted on their first mortgages, and Cardinal’s financial troubles increased because of further poor decision making by CII. CII and its subsidiary Cardinal Industries of Florida (CIF) (debtor) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Despite cutting back on personnel and other obligations after their bankruptcy filings, CII and CIF continued to lose money. CII’s and CIF’s proposed reorganizations required restructuring the secured loans, altering the partnership structure, and delaying distributions to unsecured creditors. These proposals were based on CII’s and CIF’s representations about the valuation of the partnership properties, but CII’s and CIF’s financial records were unreliable, and CII and CIF were not providing accurate and timely financial information to the creditors’ committees. CII and CIF had also fired their lawyers just as progress was being made in negotiations with the partnerships’ secured lenders. CII’s and CIF’s creditors’ committees moved under 11 U.SC. § 1104(a) for the appointment of trustees in the bankruptcy cases.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sellers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership