In re Carmen’s Petition
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
165 F.Supp. 942 (1958)
Carmen (petitioner), a Native American, was incarcerated at the California State Penitentiary at San Quentin after being convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Thereafter, Carmen filed a writ of habeas corpus in U.S. District Court claiming that the state court lacked jurisdiction to try and convict him of the offense. Instead, Carmen argued that federal statute required his case to have been tried in federal district court. The statute relied upon by Carmen was known as the Ten Major Crimes Act (the Act) as incorporated in Sections 1151, 1153, and 3242 of Title 18 of the United States Code. The Act provided that a Native American who committed any of the 10 enumerated crimes within the statute must be tried in federal court. Murder was one of the specific crimes listed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goodman, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.