In Re Castleton Plaza, LP
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
707 F.3d 821 (2013)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
George Broadbent owned Castleton Plaza, LP (Castleton) (debtor), which owned a shopping center. Castleton’s only secured lender, EL-SNPR Notes Holdings (creditor), held a $10 million note at 8.37 percent interest with additional security features. When the note matured, Castleton defaulted and filed for reorganization. Castleton proposed a reorganization plan that entailed paying the $10 million note down by $300,000, writing down the balance to $8.2 million, and treating the difference as unsecured. The loan would be extended for 30 years at 6.25 percent interest without additional security features, and Castleton would pay only 15 percent for unsecured claims. Technically George would retain no equity in the reorganized entity because 100 percent would go to his wife, Mary Clare Broadbent, for a $75,000 investment. Mary owned all the equity in The Broadbent Company, which would continue running Castleton under its management contract with George as chief executive officer drawing a $500,000 salary. The lender countered that the equity was worth more and offered $600,000 and to pay all creditors in full. Castleton rejected that proposal but increased Mary’s proposed investment to $375,000. The lender asked the bankruptcy judge to condition plan acceptance on Mary making the highest bid in open competition. The judge found competition unnecessary and approved the plan but certified a direct appeal to the Seventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.