In re Certain Wearable Electronic Devices with ECG Functionality and Components Thereof

Inv. No. 337-TA-1266 (Jan. 20, 2023)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Certain Wearable Electronic Devices with ECG Functionality and Components Thereof

United States International Trade Commission
Inv. No. 337-TA-1266 (Jan. 20, 2023)

Facts

California company AliveCor (plaintiff) designed and developed wearable electronic devices to help users detect and monitor heart conditions. AliveCor obtained patents for its technologies and marketed its products for use in conjunction with the Apple Watch via an app and a watchband accessory known as the KBS system. AliveCor invested in research and development to build KBS. Even after AliveCor stopped manufacturing and selling KBS in 2018, AliveCor continued investing in research and development related to making use of its patented technologies and making improvements that benefited current users. AliveCor eventually filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission (ITC) alleging that Apple Inc. (defendant) was violating § 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing Apple Watches that infringed AliveCor’s patents. Specifically, AliveCor alleged that Apple copied AliveCor’s technology and then made the Apple operating system incompatible with AliveCor’s software, attempting to drive AliveCor out of the market. Apple denied violating § 337. Alternatively, Apple argued that even if it violated § 337, remedial orders excluding the importation of offending watches would be inappropriate because the orders would raise public health and welfare concerns. Specifically, Apple argued that (1) current Apple Watch users would not be able to enjoy the watches’ many features, including its health features, and (2) research projects using allegedly infringing watches would be hindered. An administrative-law judge issued a determination that AliveCor had proved the existence of a domestic industry, a requirement for relief under § 337. The ITC reviewed that determination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (1)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership