In re Certified Question of Law

858 F.3d 591 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Certified Question of Law

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
858 F.3d 591 (2016)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

A United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) judge issued an order authorizing the government to use pen-register/trap-and-trace (PR/TT) devices on a cellular telephone number in an investigation of clandestine intelligence activities. The order authorized the recording and decoding of all post-cut-through digits (PCTDs)—numbers dialed after a telephone call is connected. The FISC certified to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review the question whether a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) order could authorize the government to obtain all PCTDs, subject to a prohibition on the investigative use of any contents acquired, if there was no reasonably available technology that would permit the collection of only non-content PCTDs or permit the government, upon receiving the information, to discard PCTDs that were content while retaining those that were not. The certified question required the court to consider whether the statute authorized the interception of PCTDs and, if it did, whether it contravened the Fourth Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership