In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel Case No. 15976
Minnesota Supreme Court
653 N.W.2d 452 (2002)
An attorney (defendant) was representing in a personal injury lawsuit a client who had been seriously and permanently injured by a bus. Prior to the injury, the client had only worked unskilled physical labor jobs, and asserted that he lacked the education or intelligence to find other types of work. The client claimed that his permanent injuries would therefore prevent him from working in the future and sought damages. The case came before Judge Franklin Knoll (plaintiff). Judge Knoll had a law clerk who was severely disabled. The clerk worked in the court, and in front of the jury, although in a wheelchair on a respirator with a full-time attendant. The client became concerned that the jury would compare his injuries to the clerk’s more serious disability and thereby question his claimed inability to work in the future, and that he could not receive a fair trial with the clerk’s presence. The attorney filed a motion on this rationale, asking for a mistrial and another panel of jurors without the clerk present, or that the case be assigned to another judge. Judge Knoll denied the motion. The jury found in favor of the opposing party. The attorney filed a motion for a new trial, using the clerk’s presence as one basis for the motion, with no legal authority as support. Judge Knoll brought a disciplinary complaint against the attorney for discriminatory conduct. The disciplinary panel held that the attorney’s conduct was non-serious but warranted some discipline and issued the attorney an admonition.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.