In re Chicago Flood Litigation
Illinois Supreme Court
680 N.E.2d 265 (1997)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
A freight tunnel in downtown Chicago flooded. The plaintiffs—various individuals and businesses that owned property connected to the tunnel—sued the City of Chicago (defendant) for damages. The plaintiffs sought damages for, among other things, damage to their property, lost revenues, lost wages, and lost inventory. The trial court allowed recovery for physical damage to the plaintiffs’ property, including lost perishable inventory due to the time that the power was out as a result of the flood. The trial court held, however, that the economic-loss rule prohibited the plaintiffs from recovering for their pure economic loss. The court of appeals affirmed. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Freeman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.