In re Christian S.
California Supreme Court
7 Cal.4th 768, 872 P.2d 574 (1994)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Christian S. (defendant) was a minor who was physically and verbally harassed by Robert Elliott and Elliott’s friends for a year. Christian began carrying a handgun out of fear of Elliott. One day Elliott chased Christian down the beach, threatening him and challenging Elliott to fire the gun. Elliott advanced on Christian repeatedly, stopping only when Christian would raise the gun at him. Eventually when Elliott was approximately 20 feet away, Christian shot and killed him. Christian was charged in juvenile court with second-degree murder. Christian raised the defense of imperfect self-defense, but the court rejected the defense and concluded that Christian had committed a killing that would amount to second-degree murder if committed by an adult. The court made Christian a ward of the juvenile court. Christian appealed and the court of appeals reversed the judgement, holding that Christian had acted out of an honest belief that Elliott was about to cause him serious harm. The court of appeals further held that the state legislature’s recent amendments to the penal code to eliminate the diminished capacity defense did not eliminate the defense of imperfect self-defense. The state appealed the court of appeal’s ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.