In re City of Memphis

293 F.3d 345 (2002)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re City of Memphis

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
293 F.3d 345 (2002)

SH

Facts

The City of Memphis adopted a Minority & Women Business Enterprise Procurement Program (the program) in 1996 as a solution for past discrimination and to prevent future discrimination. In enacting the program, the city relied on a disparity study covering the period from 1988 to 1992. A builders and contractors association and a construction company (plaintiffs) brought suit against the city, alleging that the city’s preferences to minorities under the program violated the Fourteenth Amendment. In response, the city proposed commissioning a new disparity study to cover the period from 1993 to 1998. The city desired to use this post-enactment study as evidence to demonstrate a compelling government interest. The district court denied the city’s request. The district court certified for appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the question of whether the post-enactment study should be allowed as evidence of a compelling government interest.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Guy Jr., J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership