In re City of Memphis
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
293 F.3d 345 (2002)
- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
The City of Memphis adopted a Minority & Women Business Enterprise Procurement Program (the program) in 1996 as a solution for past discrimination and to prevent future discrimination. In enacting the program, the city relied on a disparity study covering the period from 1988 to 1992. A builders and contractors association and a construction company (plaintiffs) brought suit against the city, alleging that the city’s preferences to minorities under the program violated the Fourteenth Amendment. In response, the city proposed commissioning a new disparity study to cover the period from 1993 to 1998. The city desired to use this post-enactment study as evidence to demonstrate a compelling government interest. The district court denied the city’s request. The district court certified for appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the question of whether the post-enactment study should be allowed as evidence of a compelling government interest.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Guy Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.