Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re CNX Gas Corporation Shareholders Litigation

Delaware Court of Chancery
2010 WL 2291842 (Del. Ch. May 25, 2010)


Facts

CONSOL Energy (CONSOL) (defendant) owned 83.5 percent of CNX Gas Corp. (CNX) (defendant). After an unsuccessful attempt at acquiring CNX’s outstanding shares, CONSOL eliminated CNX’s board committees and decreased the number of directors. Only one director, John Pipski, was independent. CONSOL negotiated with T. Rowe Price (Price), an institutional investor that held 6.3 percent of CNX’s stock and 6.5 percent of CONSOL’s on an acceptable tender offer. CONSOL commenced a two-step freeze-out merger, offering $38.25 per share for its tender offer and planning a short-form merger afterward. The offer was conditional on a majority of the minority shares being tendered. CNX’s board authorized a special committee consisting of Pipski to consider the merger and complete a Section 14D-9 form for the Securities and Exchange Commission. The board refused to add an additional director or authorize the committee to negotiate. Pipski nevertheless tried to get CONSOL to up its offer. The CNX board retroactively authorized the committee to negotiate, but CONSOL refused to raise the price. The committee did not give an opinion on the offer, but suggested that CONSOL’s agreement with Price, whose interests were different than other minority shareholders’, assured the tender offer’s success and nullified the majority-of-the-minority condition. CNX’s minority shareholders (plaintiffs) sued in the Delaware Court of Chancery to challenge the tender offer.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Laster, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.