In re Cold Harbor Assocs., L.P.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
204 B.R. 904 (1997)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
ALI, Inc. (creditor) filed an involuntary-bankruptcy petition against Cold Harbor Associates, L.P. (Cold Harbor) (debtor) pursuant to § 303(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, which allowed a single creditor to file an involuntary petition against a creditor if there were fewer than 12 other unsecured creditors of the debtor. Cold Harbor moved to dismiss the involuntary petition on the basis that there were more than 12 other unsecured creditors. In support of its argument, Cold Harbor relied on each of its limited partners as constituting an unsecured creditor. Each limited partner contributed funds to Cold Harbor in an amount proportional to his ownership interest, and each limited partner also received a promissory note for the amount contributed. The funds were used to pay an outstanding mortgage secured by real estate owned by Cold Harbor. The promissory notes had no security mechanism and entitled the limited partners to a fixed rate of interest, 6 percent, which was equal to the prime rate at the time. The promissory notes also allowed for the reimbursement the attorney’s fees of the limited partners in the event of default. However, the promissory notes had no defined due date and no payment schedule, and no limited partner made any demand for payment on them. ALI argued that the limited partners could not be considered unsecured creditors, because their contributions had to be considered equity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shelley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.