In re Continental Air Lines, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
780 F.2d 1223 (1986)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Continental Air Lines, Inc. (Continental) (defendant) filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and continued operations as a debtor-in-possession. Continental sought the bankruptcy court’s permission to enter lease agreements for two aircraft to implement service along new routes. After a hearing, the court decided that the lease transactions were justified by a valid business purpose because Continental’s revenues would be jeopardized if the proposed leases were not approved. Continental’s institutional creditors (the creditors) (plaintiffs) objected to the leases, arguing that the transactions were designed to shortcut the Bankruptcy Code’s required protections for creditors. The Bankruptcy Code’s protections included the requirements that majorities of impaired creditor classes consent to a plan, the requirements that the plan avoid unfair discrimination among creditors, and similar safeguards. Although it was unclear which protections the creditors alleged had been denied, the court did not consider the creditors’ claims prior to authorizing the leases, reasoning that the leases would not affect the terms of a future reorganization plan. The creditors appealed to the federal district court, which affirmed the bankruptcy court. The creditors appealed. The United States District Court for the Fifth Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.