In re Custody of Landry

662 So. 2d 169 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Custody of Landry

Louisiana Court of Appeal
662 So. 2d 169 (1995)

Facts

Margie Wilson and Kenneth Landry (plaintiff) were an unmarried couple with three minor children. In April of 1994, Landry filed a petition for temporary custody of the children, claiming that Wilson had abandoned the family’s home. The trial court awarded Landry temporary custody. Wilson subsequently sought sole custody of the children and other relief, including child support and a psychological evaluation of Landry. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on the matter in November of 1994. At the end of the hearing, the court announced its decision to implement a joint-custody plan for the children. Under that plan, the children would live with Wilson but have regular visitation with Landry. Landry started to argue with the judge about the decision, but the judge found Landry in contempt and sentenced him to spend the weekend in jail. Following that ruling, Desdemona Landry, who was Kenneth’s mother and the children’s grandmother, told the judge that she and her husband wanted custody of the children and that she would give the children a good home. Desdemona and the judge proceeded to discuss Desdemona’s offer, including the need to consider the children’s best interests and the judge’s concerns about Wilson and Landry. Following the discussion, the court vacated its decision to implement the joint-custody plan and allowed the children to continue living with Landry until a hearing the following month. At that later hearing, the trial court awarded provisional custody of the children to Desdemona. Wilson appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, arguing, among other things, that the trial court erred by allowing Desdemona to give unsworn testimony at the November hearing.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gonzales, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership