In re Daisy Systems Corp.

97 F.3d 1171 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Daisy Systems Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
97 F.3d 1171 (1996)

Facts

The chief executive officer (CEO) of Daisy Systems Corporation (Daisy) (plaintiff), engaged Bear Stearns, a sophisticated investment bank, to provide advice on an acquisition of the company Cadnetix. Daisy’s CEO had no public-company acquisition experience. Michael Tennenbaum of Bear Stearns sent Daisy an engagement letter. Cadnetix, however, rejected Daisy’s merger proposal. Tennenbaum then recommended a hostile takeover to Daisy. Daisy’s board of directors agreed, and the engagement letter was amended to provide for Bear Stearns to act as Daisy’s dealer manager in a hostile tender offer and to assist in securing financing. Bear Stearns would receive further fees for issuing Daisy a letter that Bear Stearns was “highly confident” that Daisy could secure financing. During September and October 1988, Daisy announced multiple tender offers for Cadnetix stock, with each rejected by Cadnetix. After each offer, Bear Stearns issued a “highly confident” letter. On October 24, 1988, Daisy raised its offer to purchase 100 percent of Cadnetix. Bear Stearns committed to loan $130 million to Daisy in transaction financing. On November 6, 1988, Tennenbaum told Bear Stearns’s internal committee that financing was not yet secured because banks were increasingly unwilling to finance hostile deals in Daisy’s industry. On November 10, 1988, Cadnetix agreed to an uncontested merger. The engagement letter was amended to name Bear Stearns as Daisy’s exclusive agent to secure all required financing. On April 18, 1989, Bear Stearns committed $15 million of financing to Daisy, and, on April 20, 1989, Bear Stearns internally approved a $45 million bridge loan to Daisy. However, Tennenbaum told Daisy that approval had not been received. Sometime afterward, Daisy’s financial condition declined, and an involuntary bankruptcy followed. Jack Kenney, Chapter 11 trustee for Daisy, sued Bear Stearns, alleging that the absence of financing had caused Daisy’s bankruptcy. The district court found no support for a breach of fiduciary duty claim and granted Bear Stearns’s summary-judgment motion on the professional-negligence and negligent-misrepresentation claims, and Kenny appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Fernandez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership