In re Daniels
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
35 B.R. 247 (1993)
- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
Bobby Lee Daniels (debtor) owned a business named Daniels Marine, Inc. Daniels obtained financing from ITT Diversified Credit Corporation (ITT) (creditor) to purchase boats, motors, and related accessories for Daniels Marine. To secure the financing, ITT took a security interest in certain inventory and equipment. ITT perfected its security interest by filing the requisite financing statements. Thereafter, the Small Business Administration through the American Bank of Commerce (creditors) loaned Daniels Marine money and took a purchase-money security interest in Daniels Marine’s inventory and equipment. The Small Business Administration and American Bank of Commerce sent a written notice regarding their conflicting interest to ITT. The notice stated that American Bank of Commerce had taken or planned to take an interest in certain inventory and equipment owned or thereafter acquired by Daniels Marine. However, the notice did not use the words “purchase money.” Daniels subsequently filed for bankruptcy. Per the bankruptcy court’s order, the Small Business Administration conducted a foreclosure sale in which certain property was sold that ITT claimed a superior interest in. Accordingly, ITT moved for a determination that it had priority over the conflicting interest and was, therefore, entitled to the proceeds of the items sold. ITT argued that the notice it had received was ineffective because it did not contain the words “purchase money.”
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bohanon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.