In re DePorter

129 U.S.P.Q.2d 1298 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re DePorter

United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
129 U.S.P.Q.2d 1298 (2019)

Facts

Grant DePorter (plaintiff) applied to register the proposed trademark “#MAGICNUMBER108” so he could use the mark on apparel. Registration of the proposed mark was refused on the ground that it did not meet the requirements of a trademark. The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (defendant) found that the general public would perceive the proposed mark as informational and not as a trademark. The examining attorney provided evidence that the proposed mark was commonly used to refer to the Chicago Cubs’ participation in the 2016 World Series because the Cubs won for the first time in 108 years. The examining attorney submitted numerous social media posts and news stories using the proposed trademark, including some about DePorter because he was the first person associated with #MAGICNUMBER108. The uses submitted by the examining attorney, including those that referenced DePorter, did not relate to any goods sold by DePorter that bore the proposed trademark. DePorter appealed the refusal to register the proposed mark, arguing that the proposed mark qualified as a trademark because it was not commonly used.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kuczma, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership