In re Dixon-Ford
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey
2011 WL 6749083 (2011)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Mary Dixon-Ford (plaintiff) purchased a home using Weichert Realtors (Weichert) (defendant) as her realtor. Dixon-Ford financed the purchase with a mortgage loan from Weichert Financial Services (WFS) (defendant). According to Dixon-Ford, she provided WFS with documentation showing her income, but a WFS loan officer listed Dixon-Ford’s income as being several times what she actually made and altered the verification-of-employment form that WFS received from Dixon-Ford’s employer in order to qualify Dixon-Ford for a larger loan. Dixon-Ford’s mortgage was included in a mortgage-backed securities transaction and deposited into a trust, with U.S. Bank National Association (U.S. Bank) (defendant) as the trustee. Subsequently, Dixon-Ford defaulted on the loan. Dixon-Ford sued U.S. Bank, Weichert, and WFS for fraud under the common law and New Jersey statutes, arguing that she had been deceived into executing the mortgage. U.S. Bank moved for summary judgment, arguing that U.S. Bank was a holder in due course of the mortgage instrument and was therefore immune from Dixon-Ford’s claims. Weichert and WFS also moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Steckroth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.