Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I

In re DM

566 Pa. 445, 781 A.2d 1161 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re DM

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
566 Pa. 445, 781 A.2d 1161 (2001)

Facts

A police officer received an anonymous tip that a Black male wearing blue jeans, a white T-shirt, and white sneakers was one block away and holding a gun. The officer went to the site and saw DM (defendant), a juvenile who matched the description. The officer called out to DM, but DM tried to flee. Another police officer stopped DM. The police then frisked DM and found a gun on him. DM moved to suppress the gun, arguing that the police officers had lacked reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk him. The trial court denied the motion, and DM was sentenced. On appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that unprovoked flight was not relevant to a reasonable-suspicion determination and, therefore, that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop DM. However, the United States Supreme Court then issued a new decision holding that unprovoked flight in a high-crime area created reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk a suspect. The United States Supreme Court remanded DM’s case to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for additional review under the new caselaw.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cappy, J.)

Dissent (Zappala, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Children and Juveniles

Key Terms