In re Doering
Nebraska Supreme Court
751 N.W.2d 123, 275 Neb. 1004 (2008)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
David Doering (plaintiff) earned a law degree from Western State, a California law school not accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA). After graduating from law school, Doering passed the bar exam in Georgia and was admitted to practice law in Georgia. Doering worked as an attorney in good standing in Georgia before moving to Nebraska to be closer to Doering’s sick parents. Doering applied for admission to practice law in Nebraska without taking the Nebraska bar exam. The Nebraska State Bar Commission (the commission) (defendant) denied Doering’s application because Doering did not earn a law degree from an ABA-accredited law school. Doering appealed the commission’s decision, and a hearing was held. At the hearing, Doering submitted affidavits from an associate dean and law professor at Western State who testified that the Western State’s law-school program was substantially similar to ABA-accredited law schools. The commission denied Doering’s application again. Doering appealed. Among other things, Doering argued that if the court could waive licensing requirements for foreign-educated applicants, then the court must do so for applicants who received a law degree from a nonaccredited United States law school.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gerrard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.