In re Downey
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey
261 B.R. 124 (2001)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Joseph and Mary Downey (debtors) filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Lewis Golden was a taxi driver whom Joseph employed. Golden was injured while on the job and was issued a $38,225 workers’-compensation award against Joseph by the director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation (director). In connection with the award, the director issued findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment. New Jersey filed the award, findings, conclusions, and judgment with the superior court. Joseph, who did not carry workers’-compensation insurance, defaulted on the judgment. The judgment was never levied upon, and Golden never received payment on the judgment. Seeking to sell property that the Downeys owned in New Jersey, the bankruptcy trustee filed an adversary proceeding against Golden, New Jersey, and others, seeking to establish the extent, validity, and priority of any liens. Only Golden and New Jersey responded to the trustee’s suit. The trustee contended that the workers’-compensation lien was avoidable pursuant to Bankruptcy Code (code) § 544(a)(1) because it was an unlevied-upon judicial lien. New Jersey responded that the workers’-compensation lien was an unavoidable statutory lien under code § 545.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lyons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.