In re Englebrecht
California Court of Appeal
67 Cal. App. 4th 486, 79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 89 (1998)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
The district attorney (plaintiff) sought and obtained an injunction to abate a public nuisance created by members of the Posole gang in a roughly one-square-mile area commonly referred to as Eastside. The Posole gang claimed Eastside as its territory. The injunction was directed toward David Englebrecht and numerous other Posole-gang members (defendants). Within Eastside, Posole-gang members terrorized residents, committed violent crimes, engaged in illicit drug-using and selling activities, congregated in large groups, disturbed the peace by playing loud music, blocked free passage on the streets, vandalized property, and trespassed on private property, all of which caused residents to feel harassed, intimidated, and fearful for their property and lives. The injunction included a provision that prohibited Englebrecht from engaging in specified activities (“walking, driving, bicycling, gathering”) in public view with other known Posole-gang members (the association provision). The injunction also prohibited Englebrecht from using or possessing pagers or beepers in any public place (the possession provision). After the injunction was in effect, Englebrecht was observed walking on a public street in Eastside with two other men who had been documented by officers as Posole-gang members. Englebrecht was arrested with a pager in his possession. The trial court found Englebrecht in contempt of court for violating the association and possession provisions. Englebrecht filed a writ petition seeking appellate review of the constitutionality of the two provisions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.