In re Equifax, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

371 F. Supp. 3d 1150 (2019)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Equifax, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
371 F. Supp. 3d 1150 (2019)

Facts

Equifax, Inc. (defendant) collected and reported consumer information to financial institutions for the purpose of determining consumers’ creditworthiness. Despite numerous warnings that its cybersecurity was insufficient to protect the personally identifiable information (PII) it collected and stored, Equifax did not improve its security protocols. In March 2017, a third-party software program that Equifax used announced a significant vulnerability and distributed a software patch to remedy the situation. Equifax received the warnings but did not install the patch. Hackers exploited the vulnerability to access Equifax’s systems from May 13, 2017, to July 20, 2017. The hackers acquired the PII of nearly 150 million Americans, including names, Social Security numbers, birthdates, addresses, driver’s licenses, payment information, and more. Equifax publicly announced the data breach in September 2017. Various financial institutions (institutions) (plaintiffs) sued Equifax, claiming that Equifax’s failure to properly protect consumers’ PII undermined the credit-reporting system and required the institutions to expend substantial resources to determine the impact of the data breach and establish effective means of authenticating customers and detecting fraud. The institutions asserted various claims, including a negligence-per-se claim in which the institutions alleged that Equifax’s breach of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and its implementing regulations proved that Equifax had acted negligently. Equifax moved to dismiss all claims, including the negligence-per-se claim, arguing that they were not viable. The district court considered the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thrash, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership