In re Estate of Atkinson
Probate Court of Huron County, Ohio
175 N.E.2d 548 (1961)
- Written by Christine Raino, JD
Facts
Walter S. Atkinson died with a will that made gifts to Maxine Burdette and Patricia Burgeois (defendants), his daughters from a prior marriage, but made no provision for his widow, Emma Atkinson (plaintiff). Emma elected to take a spousal forced share of the estate and objected to the exclusion of three certificates of deposit (CDs) from the estate inventory and appraisement. Each of the CDs was registered in Walter’s name and marked P.O.D., meaning payable on death, to either Maxine or Patricia. Maxine and Patricia argued in opposition to Emma’s claim that the CDs should be part of the estate, that the CDs passed by operation of law upon Walter’s death and do not enter the estate. In support of their position, Maxine and Patricia asserted that the pay on death provision in the CDs is akin to bank accounts or securities where the asset passes automatically to the surviving co-owner upon death, without the requirement of being executed with the formalities of a will. Therefore, the question before the court is whether the CDs are testamentary instruments that must comply with the requirements for executing a valid will.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
