Vermont Supreme Court
528 A.2d 752 (1987)
Andrew J. Brown left his entire estate in trust, providing that the trust assets be applied to the education of the children of his nephew, Woolson Brown (plaintiff). The trust further provided that when that educational purpose had been accomplished, the Trustee was to distribute the income and as much of the principal that the trustee (defendant) deemed necessary to support Woolson and his wife, Rosemary (plaintiff), “in the style and manner to which they are accustomed, for and during the remainder of their natural lives.” After Woolson and Rosemary’s deaths, the trust would terminate and be distributed to their children in equal shares. When Woolson’s children had completed their educations, the trustee began to distribute the trust principal and income to Woolson and Rosemary consistent with the terms of the trust. Woolson and Rosemary then petitioned to terminate the trust, claiming that to accomplish the only remaining purpose of the trust – to support them in the manner to which they are accustomed – distribution of all of the trust assets was necessary. Woolson and Rosemary’s children, the remaindermen, all consented to distribution of the trust assets to their parents. The probate court denied the petition. Woolson and Rosemary appealed to the Washington Superior Court, which reversed the probate court holding that the trust could be terminated because the educational purpose of the trust had been accomplished. The trustee appealed, arguing that the trust could not be terminated because it was a both a support trust and a spendthrift trust.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.