In re Estate of Burren
Illinois Appellate Court
994 N.E.2d 1022 (2013)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Steven Miner (Steven) (plaintiff) dated the daughter of Glenn Burren (Glenn). Steven and Glenn became close friends, and they continued the friendship after Steven and Glenn’s daughter broke up. After Glenn’s divorce, he began dating Steven’s mother. A few years later, Steven became a lawyer, and his friendship with Glenn continued. In November 2003, Glenn inherited over $800,000 in assets. Soon after, Glenn added Steven to his bank account, making it a joint account. In 2004 Glenn signed a will splitting his estate into five equal parts upon his death: one for each of his three children, and one for each of Steven’s two children. The will named Steven as the executor of Glenn’s estate. Glenn then wrote a series of checks to Steven over the course of the next few years that totaled almost $500,000. In 2006 Glenn gave Steven power of attorney for his healthcare and property. Upon Glenn’s death, Steven filed Glenn’s will in probate court. Glenn’s children contested the will based on undue influence. Steven testified that he did not remember why Glenn wrote him checks for such substantial amounts, but stated that he cashed the checks for Glenn, returning the cash to him. Steven acknowledged that Glenn did not receive independent legal counsel prior to writing Steven the checks or making him part of the joint bank account. The trial court ruled that the will was invalid, and it ordered Steven to pay Glenn’s estate almost $500,000 plus prejudgment interest of over $200,000. Steven appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Neville, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.