In re Estate of Butler

444 So. 2d 477 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Estate of Butler

Florida District Court of Appeal
444 So. 2d 477 (1984)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Georgia Mae Butler (plaintiff) and Nathaniel Butler married in 1946 but unofficially separated in 1947 after a short cohabitation. Nathaniel told Georgia he had obtained a divorce from her, but Georgia was never served with divorce papers and never affirmatively sought a divorce from Nathaniel herself. Believing herself divorced, Georgia married James Whitfield in 1950. Nathaniel married Rosa Butler (defendant) in 1963, with whom he cohabitated as husband and wife until his death in 1975. Nathaniel told Rosa he was divorced from Georgia. Georgia eventually learned that she was not validly divorced from Nathaniel and that Nathaniel had married Rosa. In 1981, approximately six years after his death, Georgia filed a petition to be appointed the personal representative of Nathaniel’s estate as his surviving spouse. Rosa filed objections, arguing that Georgia could not claim surviving-spouse benefits because she had repudiated her marriage to Nathaniel by entering into a bigamous marriage with Whitfield in 1950 despite knowing that Nathaniel was still alive and that she had not received any paperwork evidencing her purported divorce. The trial court ruled that Georgia was estopped from asserting surviving-spouse rights. Georgia appealed, arguing that she had remarried in reliance on Nathaniel’s statement that he had obtained a divorce and had therefore not acted with the requisite blatant disregard for the marital relationship necessary to repudiate it and support estoppel.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lehan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership