In re Estate of Davis
Tennessee Court of Appeals
213 S.W.3d 288 (2006)
- Written by Paul Neel, JD
Facts
When singer Jim Reeves died, his wife, Mary Reeves Davis, inherited substantial property that generated an income of between $300,000 and $400,000 per year. Mary later became engaged to W. Terry Davis (plaintiff). Two days before the wedding, Mary presented Terry with a prenuptial agreement. Without consulting an attorney, Terry executed the agreement the next day. The agreement stated that the future spouses would retain their separate property and any income it generated. The agreement also stated that each spouse waived any rights to the other’s assets upon death. Further, the agreement stated that both Mary and Terry had disclosed their assets but that such disclosures did not purport to be all-inclusive and any values were estimates. Before the marriage, Terry’s assets were worth between $25,000 and $30,000. After over 30 years of marriage to Terry, Mary died. Her will bequeathed only $100,000 to Terry. Terry petitioned to instead receive an elective share of Mary’s estate, a statutory percentage that a spouse could ordinarily elect to receive instead of what the spouse would take under a decedent spouse’s will. The estate’s administrator and various heirs (defendants) claimed that the premarital agreement waived Terry’s right to an elective share. Terry countered that the agreement was unenforceable because he did not receive a disclosure of Mary’s assets before execution. Mary’s former secretary, Joyce Jackson, testified that she recalled typing up a list of assets but did not recall the list providing any values. Relying heavily on the agreement’s language, which stated that disclosures were provided, the trial court deemed the agreement enforceable. Terry appealed to the Tennessee Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Swiney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.