In re Estate of Dickson

590 So. 2d 471 (1991)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Estate of Dickson

Florida District Court of Appeal
590 So. 2d 471 (1991)

Facts

James J. Dickson executed a will on February 2, 1981, that complied with Florida’s statutory will requirements. The will, which was four pages long, was typed. The last page was a self-proof affidavit with a raised notarial seal. On that page was a handwritten statement in red ink dated March 16, 1987. The handwritten portion stated, “I myself declare this will null and void of sound mind.” Following this statement was Dickson’s signature. The notarial seal was circled, and the word “void” was written on top. Following Dickson’s death, Dickson’s personal attorney (plaintiff), who had prepared the will, filed a petition for determination of the validity of the will. The trial court held that the attempted revocation had failed because Dickson’s physical act was insufficient. Without hearing evidence on whether Dickson intended to revoke his will, the court admitted the will for probate. Kim Bertoglio and others (defendants) appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nesbitt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership