In re Estate of Garver
New Jersey Superior Court
343 A.2d 817 (1975)
Facts
Edward Garver and his first wife, Laura Garver, had two children together. Edward and Laura were divorced in Tennessee in 1971. Pursuant to their related property settlement, Edward and Laura released each other from any present or future obligation that might exist or occur due to their marriage. Under Tennessee law, Edward and Laura’s divorce and accompanying property settlement revoked Edward’s will, under which Laura was the beneficiary, as Edward’s Tennessee counsel advised Edward at the time. Edward subsequently moved to New Jersey, where he married Elizabeth Garver (plaintiff). Edward did not make a new will after marrying Elizabeth. Upon Edward’s death, Elizabeth filed suit in New Jersey Chancery Court seeking a determination that Edward’s will was revoked by the Tennessee divorce and property settlement and seeking to be appointed as the administratrix of Edward’s estate or, in the alternative, as executor of Edward’s will if the will remained valid. Edward’s estate consisted solely of personal property in New York and Tennessee. Laura, who knew about Elizabeth’s requests, did not argue against finding Edward’s will to have been revoked. The chancery court ruled that New Jersey law governed because Edward was domiciled in New Jersey when he died and thus rejected Elizabeth’s requests because New Jersey law permitted a will to be revoked only via one of the methods specified by statute. Elizabeth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.