In re Estate of Holden
South Carolina Supreme Court
539 S.E.2d 703 (2000)
William Holden, Sr. (William), died intestate, survived by his wife, Julia Holden; his two sons, William Holden, Jr. (plaintiff), and Robert Holden (the sons); and two grandchildren. The sons filed disclaimers of their interests in William’s estate. The sons’ attorney filed a letter accompanying the disclaimers, stating the sons’ intention that their disclaimers were so the property would go to Julia. The probate court informed the estate’s personal representative that after the disclaimers, a portion of the estate would go to the grandchildren. As a result, the sons filed a “Revocation and Withdrawal of Disclaimer.” The probate court appointed a guardian ad litem (defendant) for the grandchildren and found the sons’ disclaimers to be valid and the revocations to be invalid. The court found that half of the estate would go to the grandchildren. The circuit court reversed, finding that the disclaimers were invalid due to inconsistency with the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, under the code, a qualified disclaimer was valid for tax purposes if the disclaimed interest passed without any direction from the disclaimant. The court of appeals reversed, finding that the disclaimers were valid under the code. The sons appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burnett, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.