In re Estate of Johnson

739 N.W.2d 493 (2007)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Estate of Johnson

Iowa Supreme Court
739 N.W.2d 493 (2007)

Play video

Facts

Roy Johnson and his wife Emogene (plaintiff), purchased a home, taking title as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. In 1998, Emogene suffered a stroke. The family decided that Emogene should transfer her interest in the homestead to Roy, assuming that Roy would survive her. In 1999, Emogene executed a power of attorney authorizing her daughter Janice to convey her interest. Janice signed a quitclaim deed on Emogene’s behalf, which provided that Roy and Emogene, as husband and wife, thereby conveyed all interest in the homestead to Roy. Roy passed away in December 1999, survived by Emogene and their three children. The Johnsons’ daughter Beverly was named as the executor of Roy’s estate (defendant). As the surviving spouse, Emogene elected to take against the will. The district court concluded that Emogene’s transfer to Roy was invalid because she was incompetent when she executed the power of attorney. The court found, however, that Roy had unilaterally terminated the joint tenancy by conveying his interest to himself, because the deed expressed his intent to terminate the joint tenancy. The court further concluded that, despite Emogene’s statutory homestead rights, Roy was not precluded from terminating the joint tenancy because his self-conveyance only severed the tenancy, creating a tenancy in common under which Emogene maintained her right to possess the homestead. The court found that title to the homestead was properly split between Emogene and Roy’s estate as tenants in common. Emogene appealed, but passed away thereafter. Her son was named executor of her estate.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cady, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership