From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
In re Estate of Kievernagel
California Court of Appeal
83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 311 (2008)
Joseph and Iris Kievernagel were married and froze Joseph’s sperm for purposes of in vitro fertilization. Joseph did not want to have a child but nonetheless agreed to have his sperm frozen. Pursuant to a contract with the fertility center, the frozen sperm was Joseph’s sole, separate property. The agreement stated that Joseph’s frozen sperm was to be discarded upon his death. Joseph died, and Iris (plaintiff) filed a petition with the probate court, seeking ownership of Joseph’s frozen sperm. Joseph’s parents (defendants) opposed the petition. The probate court denied Iris’s petition, finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Joseph’s intent was that the sperm be destroyed upon his death. Iris appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Morrison, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.