In re Estate of Magnus
Minnesota Court of Appeals
444 N.W.2d 295 (1989)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Dorothy Magnus executed a will that created a testamentary trust for the benefit of Donald and Gerald Sweeney (defendants), Magnus’s friends. The will stated that the trust would be funded with all the capital stock of Heileman Brewing Company (Heileman) that Magnus owned at her death. While Magnus was still alive, Heileman repurchased all its existing shares of stock, and the purchase cash was placed in escrow accounts for the former shareholders to collect. The former shareholders could bring their stock certificates to specific banks to exchange for the cash owed to them. Magnus exchanged some Heileman stock certificates for approximately $715,000 in cash. A few months later, Magnus died. The personal representative handling Magnus’s estate (plaintiff) found additional Heileman stock certificates in a safe-deposit box and exchanged them for approximately $275,000. The probate court found that (1) the testamentary trust should receive nothing because Magnus did not own any capital stock in Heileman at the time of her death and (2) the $275,000 received from the former Heileman stock certificates that Magnus still owned at her death belonged to the residuary estate. The Sweeneys appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Forsberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.